OPINION
As DelBene backs Fast Track, trade talking points belie reality
By JEFF JOHNSON
Her part of the conversation was similar to what I heard from Washington’s Democratic Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell, and Reps. Rick Larsen (D-2nd) and Derek Kilmer (D-6th): We are a trade-dependent state. Presidents need to have the ability to negotiate trade agreements without being encumbered by congressional amendments so that they can negotiate the best deals. The labor and environmental standards built into the TPA are better than those of the past. The president deserves our trust, and though we disagree on this issue we need to keep the lines of communication open because there are so many other important issues that we need to work on together.
I appreciated the calls, and the face-to-face meeting I had with Rep. Kilmer. I also appreciate the fact that there are many other issues coming up upon which it will be important for us to exchange views.
However, I am profoundly disappointed that we disagree on an issue of such grave importance to working people and our communities. And I am profoundly disappointed that our visions of reality for working people in Washington state and our country are so very different.
The reality that I see is:
► Words don’t protect workers or the environment, actions do. Where is the action plan on enforcing labor, human rights, and environmental standards? What, other than the intentions of the president, gives us any degree of confidence that this trade deal will actually include enforceable standards? I am reminded of the saying that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions.” I want to see the road to actual enforcement. Show us the plan that guarantees effective enforcement.
► CEOs and shareholders will likely benefit from trade, but the vast majority of workers, particularly in the manufacturing sector, will continue to suffer from trade-related job displacement, loss of income and benefits, and loss of revenue to their communities.
► Aerospace supply-sector jobs may increase, but for the most part, these jobs are no longer family-wage jobs. And the truth is that, more likely than not, many of these companies will export their operations and production overseas.
► When there are no enforceable protections against currency manipulation, gains from the reduction of tariff barriers are elusive. Allowing our “trading partners” to deliberately undervalue their currency cheats American workers and companies instead of allowing us to compete on a level playing field.
► Increasing the potential for exports while maintaining domestic tax policies that incentivize the offshoring of U.S. jobs only exacerbates the exporting of American jobs.
► Allowing a non-elected, corporate tribunal to evaluate investor-to-state disputes should send shivers down everyone’s spines. Corporations have continually made a mess out of the global economy by demanding lower taxes and government austerity that shreds or eliminates social programs and safety nets designed for the public good. There is no sane reason why we should give them any standing in the evaluation of public policy and the common interest.
► Given China’s deep integration into trade and the supply chains of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) countries, it is nonsensical to believe that signing the TPP agreement will lessen China’s economic influence on the world economy. China can reap the benefits of TPP by sending parts to TPP countries for final assembly and export, without having to meet TPP standards for the production of those parts.
► There is no effective off-ramp in the TPA. If we agree to the trade agreement, we are stuck with it.
► If TPA passes the House, then TPP will likely pass Congress. Given the widespread popular distrust of TPP and its corporate backers, what political advantage will accrue to Democrats who vote for TPA? I suspect that if TPA and TPP pass, the White House will similarly pass from Democrats to Republicans, and our ability to address the crises of extreme income inequality and climate disruption will become even more difficult.
The truth as I see it is that this vote on TPA and TPP far outweighs any other vote before Congress through 2016. There is nothing that will pass Congress through 2016 that will counterbalance the long-term consequences of the TPA and TPP for American workers and our communities.
A truly fair trade agreement would not require such secrecy nor would it require a Democratic President exerting so much pressure on members of his own party to vote for something most of them know is not in the best interests of the American people.
sprentic
June 3, 2015 at 2:49 pm
Thank-you, Jeff – for your insightful comments, and for standing up for the people and the environment.